Sunday, May 17, 2015
Self Inspection Handbook and The FSO-Classified Storage
This section continues our discussion of the DSS’ The Self-Inspection Handbook for NISP Contractors. We are still addressing Section M, classified storage. This update addresses perimeter controls that deter and detect unauthorized removal and introduction of classified information.
5-103 Is a system of perimeter controls maintained to deter or detect unauthorized introduction or removal of classified information from the facility? If so, when, where, and how are these being implemented?
According to NISPOM 5-103. Perimeter Controls. Contractors authorized to store classified material shall establish and maintain a system to deter and detect unauthorized introduction or removal of classified material from their facility.
Traceability is an important part of protecting classified information. There is plenty of allusion in industry best practices, NISPOM, and training that only TOP SECRET information is to be accountable. There is tremendous direction for application of accountability for TOP SECRET information, including the designation of a TOP SECRET Control Officer or TSCO. This position also has detailed responsibilities of how to receive, account for, trace, destroy, and remove the information that could cause extremely grave damage to national security if disclosed to uncleared and persons without need to know.
Though many FSOs are actively protecting classified information in this manner, practitioners must be specific while communicating the requirements. I learned this lesson early when writing DoD Security Clearance and Contracts Guidebook. I had sent it out for review, editing, and comments from leaders in the industry. In the earlier version I wrote that “all classified information must be accounted for”. After all, I felt it was a safe assumption to write for a book about how to protect classified information. Language in the NISPOM suggests that classified information must be produced in a reasonable amount of time. Also, classified information should be reported if disclosed in an authorized manner, compromised, stolen or lost.
So how could you prove it was lost, stolen or otherwise safe unless you know what you have and how much of it is there? That sounds like accountability to me.
Though the reviewer and expert in the field expressed, rather emphatically, that I could not write such language but that the contractor could use an information management system to keep up with classified information. For the final version of the book, we agreed on using information management instead of accountability, but I still feel that some TS protection measures, accountability and traceability, should be practiced to protect all classified information.
Without creating a great resource burden to the enterprise, the FSO can manage classified information responsibly and protect classified information by tracking and documenting what is stored on site, in what format, and how many copies there are. Additionally, contractors should discourage the introduction or removal of classified material without proper authority. A best practice includes centrally storing all classified information, receipting classified information, documenting the information in an information management system (IMS) such as SIMSSOFTWARE, and controlling the use of the classified information.
Commercially available IMS uses information technology to create a detailed database that helps FSOs track classified material through many dispositions from receipt, inventory requirements and final disposition. Some produce receipts, tie to a barcode scanner, report statistical data that can help determine use and much more. For example, if an inventory reveals missing classified information, the database can provide valuable information to help reconstruct the classified information’s history.
However, this doesn’t always have to be an expensive software or network endeavor. Some inexpensive and free solutions are available. I once produced my classified document library system on a printed Microsoft Excel spreadsheet to DSS' satisfaction.
Technology also exists to create a classified library or database and associating it with scanner software. Barcodes can be printed and applied to classified items for scanning. If an item is destroyed, shipped, filed, loaned or returned, it can be scanned and the status updated. These databases provide reports identifying when and where the barcode on the classified document was scanned and the last disposition.
The FSO can use the technology to research dates, methods of receipt, contract number, assigned document number, assigned barcode, title, classification, copy number, location, and name of the receiver. For more information, see our blog post Information Management Systems. http://dodsecurity.blogspot.com/2011/04/information-management-systems.html#.VVY_k-lFB9A